Compare Renault Espace 4 vs Renault Grand Scenic 4 vs BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 LCI

Variants
1.9 dCi
2.0
2.0 136
2.0 dCi 130
2.0 dCi 130 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 AT
2.0 dCi 173
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 AT
2.0 TCe 170
2.0 Turbo 163
2.0 Turbo 163 AT
2.0 Turbo 170
2.0 Turbo 170 AT
2.0 Turbo 170 Euro3
2.2 dCi 139
2.2 dCi 150
2.2 dCi 150 AT
3.0 dCi 177 AT
3.0 dCi 181 AT
3.5 AT
3.5 Euro3 AT
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 110 Hybrid
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 160 AT
1.7 dCi 120
1.7 dCi 120 AT
1.7 dCi 150
1.7 dCi 150 AT
216d
216d DCT
216i
218d
218d AT
218d xDrive
218d xDrive AT
218i Euro6d
218i Euro6d AT
218i
218i DCT
220d AT
220d xDrive AT
220i Euro6d AT
220i DCT
225i xDrive AT
225xe Euro6d xDrive AT
225xe Euro6d-TEMP xDrive AT
225xe xDrive AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
291 L / 10.3 cu-ft ~ 2860 L / 101.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
83.0 L / 21.9 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
7
5 / 7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 320 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 290 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Size | Length
4354 mm / 171.4 in
Size | Width
1866 mm / 73.5 in | 2128 mm / 83.8 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1574.0 mm / 62.0 in
1602.0 mm / 63.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
20 in
Wheelbase
2803 mm / 110.4 in
2804 mm / 110.4 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.35

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
26%
10%
33%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Lots of space inside
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Lots of space inside for its size
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.