HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford S-MAX 2 vs Volkswagen Golf Plus 6 vs Volkswagen Golf 7 Sportsvan

Variants
1.5 160
1.5 165
2.0 AT
2.0 AT
2.0D 120
2.0D 120 Euro6d
2.0D 150
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 150 AWD
2.0D 150 Euro6d
2.0D 150 Euro6d AWD
2.0D 180
2.0D 180 AT
2.0D 180 AWD AT
2.0D 190 AT
2.0D 190 AWD AT
2.0D 190 Euro6d
2.0D 210 AT
2.0D Bi-Turbo 240 AT
1.4
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 122 DSG
1.4 TSI 160
1.4 TSI 160 DSG
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 116
1.0 TSI 116 DSG
1.0 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 131
1.5 TSI 131 DSG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 110 DSG
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI SCR 150 DSG
Golf R
Golf R DSG

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
395 L / 13.9 cu-ft ~ 1450 L / 51.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5 / 7
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/55 R17, 235/50 R18, 245/45 R19
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1953 mm / 76.9 in
1592 mm / 62.7 in
Size | Length
4796 mm / 188.8 in
4204 mm / 165.5 in
Size | Width
1759 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1517.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 19
Wheelbase
2849 mm / 112.2 in
2578 mm / 101.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
44%
26%
28%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Fully independent suspensions
  • More interior space than the Golf
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Uglier than the Golf
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.