HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford Galaxy 3 vs Mazda 5 II vs Ford S-MAX 2 facelift

Variants
1.5 160
1.5 165
2.0D 120 Euro6d
2.0D 150 Euro6d AT
2.0D 150 Euro6d AWD
2.0D 150 Euro6d
2.0D 190 Euro6d AT
2.0D 190 Euro6d AWD AT
2.0D 190 Euro6d
2.0D Bi-Turbo 240 AT
2.0 240 AT
2.0D 120
2.0D 150 AWD
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 180 AWD AT
2.0D 180 AT
2.0D 180
2.0D 210 AT
1.6D
1.8
2.0 144 AT
2.0 150
1.5 EcoBoost 165
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT
2.5 190 Hybrid

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft ~ 2339 L / 82.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5 / 7
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/55 R17, 235/50 R18, 245/45 R19
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.9 m / 39.2 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
124 mm / 4.9 in
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1747 mm / 68.8 in
1615 mm / 63.6 in
Size | Length
4848 mm / 190.9 in
4585 mm / 180.5 in
Size | Width
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
1750 mm / 68.9 in
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 19
Wheelbase
2849 mm / 112.2 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
48%
46%
24%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Excellent design
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.