Compare Ford Galaxy 2 vs Mazda 5 II vs Ford S-MAX 2 facelift
Variants
1.8 TDCi 101
1.8 TDCi 125
2.0 AT
2.0
2.0 TDCi 130
2.0 TDCi 140
2.2 TDCi 175
2.3
1.6D
1.8
2.0 144 AT
2.0 150
1.5 EcoBoost 165
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT
2.5 190 Hybrid
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
308 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 2325 L / 82.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
7
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.9 m / 39.2 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1723 mm / 67.8 in
1615 mm / 63.6 in
Size | Length
4820 mm / 189.8 in
4585 mm / 180.5 in
Size | Width
1854 mm / 73.0 in
1750 mm / 68.9 in
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1589.0 mm / 62.6 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
47%
46%
24%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Good automatic transmission
- Good towing capacity
- Excellent design
- High cargo capacity
- Decent engine reliability
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Ugly
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.