Compare Citroen C8 vs Citroen C3 Picasso vs Mercedes B-Class W246

Mercedes-Benz B-Class W246 Minivan (2011-2014)

Citroen | Cars

Mercedes-Benz | Cars

Variants

2.0 HDi 163

2.0 HDi 163 AT

2.0 HDi 109

2.0 HDi 109 AT

2.0 HDi 120

2.0 HDi 136

2.0 136

2.0 136 AT

2.0 140

2.0 140 AT

2.2 HDi 128

2.2 HDi Biturbo 170

2.2 HDi Biturbo 170 AT

2.2 158

3.0 204 AT

1.4 VTi

1.4 VTi Euro5

1.4 VTi LPG

1.6 e-HDi

1.6 HDi 109PS

1.6 HDi 112PS

1.6 HDi 90PS

1.6 VTi 115PS

1.6 VTi 120PS

B 160 CDI

B 160 CDI DCT

B 180

B 180 DCT

B 180 CDI (OM651)

B 180 CDI (OM651) DCT

B 180 CDI (OM607)

B 180 CDI (OM607) DCT

B 200

B 200 DCT

B 200 CDI

B 200 CDI DCT

B 220 4MATIC DCT

B 220 CDI DCT

B 250 DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

225 L / 7.9 cu-ft ~ 2948 L / 104.1 cu-ft

488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1547 L / 54.6 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

80.0 L / 21.1 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, coil spring

Trailing arm

Turning Circle

10.6 m / 34.8 ft

11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Minivan

5-door Station Wagon

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height

1669 mm / 65.7 in

1557 mm / 61.3 in

Size | Length

4727 mm / 186.1 in

4078 mm / 160.6 in

4359 mm / 171.6 in

Size | Width

1766 mm / 69.5 in | 2050 mm / 80.7 in (mirror unfolded)

Track Width | Front

1570.0 mm / 61.8 in

1466.0 mm / 57.7 in

1552.0 mm / 61.1 in

Track Width | Rear

1465.0 mm / 57.7 in

1549.0 mm / 61.0 in

Wheelbase

2823 mm / 111.1 in

2540 mm / 100.0 in

2699 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.308

Towing Capacity

695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

83.0 mm / 3.3 in

Engine | Stroke

73.7 mm / 2.9 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score

20%

24%

Pros

High cargo capacity
Good towing capacity

Easy to fix

Low official fuel consumption
Less ugly than before

Cons

Some unreliable petrol engines
Horrible 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
No independent rear suspensions
Poor automatic transmissions

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
Very ugly

No powerful engine options
Basic suspension setup
Poor fit and finish

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.