Compare Citroen C4 Picasso vs Mercedes B-Class W246 vs Citroen Grand C4 Picasso
Variants
1.6 HDi 112 AT
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 109 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 140 AT
1.6 150 AT
1.6 156 AT
1.6 120
1.8 125 AT
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 140 4AT
2.0 140 6AT
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI (OM651)
B 180 CDI (OM651) DCT
B 180 CDI (OM607)
B 180 CDI (OM607) DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 DCT
1.6 HDi 112 AT
1.6 HDi 109 6MT
1.6 HDi 109 5MT
1.6 HDi 109 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 140 AT
1.6 150 AT
1.6 156 AT
1.6 120 Euro5
1.6 120
1.8 125
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 140 4AT
2.0 140 6AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft ~ 1734 L / 61.2 cu-ft
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1547 L / 54.6 cu-ft
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft ~ 1951 L / 68.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Trailing arm
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Hatchback
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1660 mm / 65.4 in
1557 mm / 61.3 in
1660 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4470 mm / 176.0 in
4359 mm / 171.6 in
4590 mm / 180.7 in
Size | Width
1830 mm / 72.0 in | 2100 mm / 82.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1830 mm / 72.0 in | 2100 mm / 82.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2728 mm / 107.4 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2728 mm / 107.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
0.31
Towing Capacity
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Redline
4200 rpm
Engine | Stroke
73.7 mm / 2.9 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
26%
24%
24%
Pros
- Decent, though quirky styling
- Good towing capacity
- Low official fuel consumption
- Less ugly than before
- More interior space than the Picasso
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Poor fit and finish
- Rather uglier than the Picasso
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.