Compare Kia Grand Carnival 2 vs Honda Odyssey 3 vs Chevrolet Uplander
Variants
2.2D AT
2.9D 170
2.9D 170 AT
2.9D 185 AT
2.9D 192 AT
3.5 AT
3.8 AT
FWD
AWD
3.5 AWD
3.5 FWD
3.9
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
912 L / 32.2 cu-ft ~ 4007 L / 141.5 cu-ft
280 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 1235 L / 43.6 cu-ft
762 L / 26.9 cu-ft ~ 3865 L / 136.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
95.0 L / 25.1 gal
Passengers
7
7
7
Payload
1200 kg / 2646 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
215/60 R16
225/60 R17
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1830 mm / 72.0 in
Size | Length
5130 mm / 202.0 in
4770 mm / 187.8 in
Size | Width
1985 mm / 78.1 in
1800 mm / 70.9 in
1830 mm / 72.0 in
Track Width | Front
1685.0 mm / 66.3 in
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1685.0 mm / 66.3 in
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Weight
1600.0 kg / 3527.4 lbs
Wheel Size
6J x 16
6.5J x 17
Wheelbase
3020 mm / 118.9 in
2830 mm / 111.4 in
3077 mm / 121.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
175.0 km/h / 108.7 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
K24
Engine | Bore
87.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.7:1
9.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.4 L / 143.7 cu-in / 2354.0 cc
Engine | Power
160.0 hp / 119.3 kW @ 5500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
68.0 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
99.0 mm / 3.9 in
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
218 Nm / 160.8 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
31%
49%
26%
Pros
- Very high cargo capacity
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Spacious interior
- Superb drivetrain reliability
- Beautiful design
- Lots of interior space
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of space inside
Cons
- Rather ugly exterior
- Uninspiring
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.