Compare Mazda 5 vs Ford Galaxy 3 vs Ford C-MAX 2

Variants
1.8
2.0
2.0D 110
2.0D 143
1.5 160
1.5 165
2.0D 120 Euro6d
2.0D 150 Euro6d AT
2.0D 150 Euro6d AWD
2.0D 150 Euro6d
2.0D 190 Euro6d AT
2.0D 190 Euro6d AWD AT
2.0D 190 Euro6d
2.0D Bi-Turbo 240 AT
2.0 240 AT
2.0D 120
2.0D 150 AWD
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 180 AWD AT
2.0D 180 AT
2.0D 180
2.0D 210 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 Euro6
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT
1.5 ECOnetic 105
1.5 TDCi 120
1.5 TDCi 120 AT
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105
1.6 Duratec 125
1.6 TDCi 115
1.6 TDCi 95
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 TDCi 115 Euro6
1.6 120
1.6 85
2.0 188 PHEV
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 AT
2.0 TDCi 163
2.0 TDCi 163 AT
2.0 TDCi 150 AT
2.0 TDCi 150
2.0 TDCi 170 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft ~ 2339 L / 82.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
7
5 / 7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/55 R17, 235/50 R18, 245/45 R19
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
12.0 m / 39.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
7.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
124 mm / 4.9 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1747 mm / 68.8 in
Size | Length
4505 mm / 177.4 in
4848 mm / 190.9 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 19
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2849 mm / 112.2 in
2649 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2005 ~ 2008

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
48%
23%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good interior seating / cargo space
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.