HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mazda 5 vs Ford Galaxy 2 vs Ford C-MAX 2

Variants
1.8
2.0
2.0D 110
2.0D 143
1.8 TDCi 101
1.8 TDCi 125
2.0 AT
2.0
2.0 TDCi 130
2.0 TDCi 140
2.2 TDCi 175
2.3
1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 Euro6
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT
1.5 ECOnetic 105
1.5 TDCi 120
1.5 TDCi 120 AT
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105
1.6 Duratec 125
1.6 TDCi 115
1.6 TDCi 95
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 TDCi 115 Euro6
1.6 120
1.6 85
2.0 188 PHEV
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 AT
2.0 TDCi 163
2.0 TDCi 163 AT
2.0 TDCi 150 AT
2.0 TDCi 150
2.0 TDCi 170 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
308 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 2325 L / 82.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
7
7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
7.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1723 mm / 67.8 in
Size | Length
4505 mm / 177.4 in
4820 mm / 189.8 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1589.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2649 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2005 ~ 2008

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
47%
23%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good interior seating / cargo space
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good automatic transmission
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.