HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chrysler Grand Voyager 5 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2 vs BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 LCI

Variants
2.4
2.8D 150
2.8D 163 AT
3.3
3.8 AT
Pacifica Hybrid
Pacifica
216d
216d DCT
216i
218d
218d AT
218d xDrive
218d xDrive AT
218i Euro6d
218i Euro6d AT
218i
218i DCT
220d AT
220d xDrive AT
220i Euro6d AT
220i DCT
225i xDrive AT
225xe Euro6d xDrive AT
225xe Euro6d-TEMP xDrive AT
225xe xDrive AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
915 L / 32.3 cu-ft ~ 3979 L / 140.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
7
5
Payload
545 kg / 1202 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.5 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 245/50 R20
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1777 mm / 70.0 in
Size | Length
5176 mm / 203.8 in
4354 mm / 171.4 in
Size | Width
2022 mm / 79.6 in | 2297 mm / 90.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Wheel Size
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 7.5J x 20
Wheelbase
3089 mm / 121.6 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
1633 kg / 3600 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 220.0 cu-in / 3605.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
355 Nm / 261.8 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
30%
56%
33%
Pros
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Lots of interior space
  • Good styling
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Large interior space
  • Very comfortable
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Lots of space inside for its size
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.