Compare Chrysler Grand Voyager 4 vs Chevrolet Uplander
Variants
2.4
2.4 AT
2.5D
2.8D AT
3.3
3.3 AWD
3.8
3.5 AWD
3.5 FWD
3.9
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
920 L / 32.5 cu-ft ~ 4130 L / 145.8 cu-ft
762 L / 26.9 cu-ft ~ 3865 L / 136.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
95.0 L / 25.1 gal
Passengers
7
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
225/60 R17
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1830 mm / 72.0 in
Size | Width
1997 mm / 78.6 in
1830 mm / 72.0 in
Track Width | Front
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Wheel Size
16 in
6.5J x 17
Wheelbase
3030 mm / 119.3 in
3077 mm / 121.1 in
Performance
Top Speed
175.0 km/h / 108.7 mph
Powertrain
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.8:1
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2001 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
26%
26%
Pros
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of interior space
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of space inside
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspension
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.