Compare Chevrolet Uplander vs Chevrolet Orlando
Variants
3.5 AWD
3.5 FWD
3.9
1.4 turbo
1.8 AT
1.8
2.0D 131
2.0D 163
2.0D 163 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
762 L / 26.9 cu-ft ~ 3865 L / 136.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
95.0 L / 25.1 gal
Passengers
7
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
225/60 R17
215/R60 R16
Turning Circle
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1830 mm / 72.0 in
1633 mm / 64.3 in
Size | Length
4652 mm / 183.1 in
Size | Width
1830 mm / 72.0 in
1836 mm / 72.3 in
Track Width | Front
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 17
16 in
Wheelbase
3077 mm / 121.1 in
2760 mm / 108.7 in
Performance
Top Speed
175.0 km/h / 108.7 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.8:1
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2011 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
26%
20%
Pros
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of space inside
- Lots of space inside
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspension
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.