Compare Mercedes B-Class W245 facelift vs Ford Galaxy 3 vs Ford Grand C-MAX

Variants
B 150 CVT
B 170
B 170 CVT
B 180 CDI
B 180 CDI CVT
B 200
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI CVT
B 200 Turbo
B 200 Turbo CVT
1.5 160
1.5 165
2.0D 120 Euro6d
2.0D 150 Euro6d AT
2.0D 150 Euro6d AWD
2.0D 150 Euro6d
2.0D 190 Euro6d AT
2.0D 190 Euro6d AWD AT
2.0D 190 Euro6d
2.0D Bi-Turbo 240 AT
2.0 240 AT
2.0D 120
2.0D 150 AWD
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 180 AWD AT
2.0D 180 AT
2.0D 180
2.0D 210 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT
1.5 TDCi 120
1.5 TDCi 120 AT
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 TDCi 115
1.6 Ti-VCT 120
2.0 TDCi 150
2.0 TDCi 150 AT
2.0 TDCi 170 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
544 L / 19.2 cu-ft ~ 2245 L / 79.3 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft ~ 2339 L / 82.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
54.0 L / 14.3 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5 / 7
5 / 7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/55 R17, 235/50 R18, 245/45 R19
205/55 R16, 215/55 R16, 215/50 R17, 235/40 R18
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.2 ft
12.0 m / 39.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
124 mm / 4.9 in
Size | Height
1747 mm / 68.8 in
Size | Length
4273 mm / 168.2 in
4848 mm / 190.9 in
Size | Width
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2035 mm / 80.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 19
Wheelbase
2778 mm / 109.4 in
2849 mm / 112.2 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
18%
48%
24%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.