Compare Dodge Caravan 4 vs Ford S-MAX 2 facelift vs Chrysler Voyager 4
Variants
2.4
3.3
3.8
1.5 EcoBoost 165
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT
2.5 190 Hybrid
2.4 147
2.4 147 AT
2.4 152
2.4 152 AT
2.5D
2.8D AT
3.3 AT
3.3 AWD AT
3.8
3.8 AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
566 L / 20.0 cu-ft ~ 4160 L / 146.9 cu-ft
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 4080 L / 144.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
7
7
Payload
634 kg / 1398 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Rigid axle
Multi-link
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Tire Size
205/65R16
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.2 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.1 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1750 mm / 68.9 in
Size | Length
4803 mm / 189.1 in
4805 mm / 189.2 in
Size | Width
1996 mm / 78.6 in
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
1995 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Weight
1820.0 kg / 4012.4 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2878 mm / 113.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2880 mm / 113.4 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
12.5 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
11.9 sec
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2000 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
29%
24%
27%
Pros
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of space inside
- High cargo capacity
- Decent engine reliability
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of interior space
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Bad transmission
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- No in dependent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.