Compare BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 LCI vs BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 vs Volkswagen Golf Plus 6

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 LCI

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45

Volkswagen Golf Plus 6

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 LCIBMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45Volkswagen Golf Plus 6
Variants
216d
216d DCT
216i
218d
218d AT
218d xDrive
218d xDrive AT
218i Euro6d
218i Euro6d AT
218i
218i DCT
220d AT
220d xDrive AT
220i Euro6d AT
220i DCT
225i xDrive AT
225xe Euro6d xDrive AT
225xe Euro6d-TEMP xDrive AT
225xe xDrive AT
214d
216d
218d
218d AT
218i
218i AT
220d
220d AT
220d xDrive AT
220i
220i AT
225i AT
225i xDrive AT
225xe xDrive AT
1.4
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 122 DSG
1.4 TSI 160
1.4 TSI 160 DSG
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI DSG

Reviews

Neofiliac score33%34%26%
Pros
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Lots of space inside for its size
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Lots of space inside
  • More interior space than the Golf
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Uglier than the Golf

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.