Compare BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 5
Variants
214d
216d
218d
218d AT
218i
218i AT
220d
220d AT
220d xDrive AT
220i
220i AT
225i AT
225i xDrive AT
225xe xDrive AT
Pacifica Hybrid
Pacifica
2.4
2.8D 150
2.8D 163 AT
3.3
3.8 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
915 L / 32.3 cu-ft ~ 3979 L / 140.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
5
7
Payload
545 kg / 1202 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Tire Size
235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 245/50 R20
Turning Circle
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
7.6 kWh (gross) | 5.8 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
293.0 V
Body Style
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1777 mm / 70.0 in
Size | Length
4342 mm / 170.9 in
5176 mm / 203.8 in
Size | Width
1800 mm / 70.9 in
2022 mm / 79.6 in | 2297 mm / 90.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Wheel Size
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 7.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
3089 mm / 121.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Towing Capacity
1633 kg / 3600 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 220.0 cu-in / 3605.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
355 Nm / 261.8 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2016
Reviews
Neofiliac score
34%
56%
30%
Pros
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Lots of space inside
- Good styling
- Very high cargo capacity
- Large interior space
- Very comfortable
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of interior space
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Somewhat ugly
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.