Compare Toyota Aygo vs Toyota Matrix 2 vs Toyota Matrix E130
Variants
1.0 VVT-i
1.0 VVT-i AT
1.0
1.0 AT
1.4 D-4D
Automatic
AWD Automatic
Manual
1.8 124PS AWD
1.8 124PS AWD AT
1.8 132PS
1.8 132PS AT
1.8 183PS
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1398 L / 49.4 cu-ft
617 L / 21.8 cu-ft ~ 1507 L / 53.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 295 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc, 277 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
155/65 R14
205/55 R16 89H
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1540 mm / 60.6 in
Size | Length
4394 mm / 173.0 in
4350 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1521.0 mm / 59.9 in
Wheel Size
4.5J x 14
16 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2340 mm / 92.1 in
2601 mm / 102.4 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
2AZ-FE I4
Engine | Bore
88.5 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.4 L / 144.1 cu-in / 2362.0 cc
Engine | Power
160.0 hp / 119.3 kW @ 5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.7 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Torque
225 Nm / 166.0 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Production
Availability
2008 ~ 2014
2002 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
12%
24%
16%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Decent exterior design
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Small turning circle
- Reliable engines
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Boring design
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.