Compare Opel Signum vs Chevrolet Cruze Hatchback vs Chevrolet Sonic 2 facelift

Variants
1.8 122
1.8 140
1.9 CDTI 100
1.9 CDTI 120
1.9 CDTI 150
1.9 CDTI 150 AT
2.0 DTI 100
2.0 Turbo 175
2.2 155
2.2 155 AT
2.2 DTI 125
2.2 DTI 125 AT
2.8 Turbo
2.8 Turbo AT
3.0 CDTI 177
3.0 CDTI 177 AT
3.0 CDTI 184
3.0 CDTI 184 AT
3.2 211
3.2 211 AT
1.4
1.4 Turbo
1.4 Turbo AT
1.6
1.7 TD 110
1.7 TD 130
1.8 AT
1.8
2.0 TD AT
2.0 TD
1.4
1.4 AT
1.8
1.8 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
413 L / 14.6 cu-ft ~ 883 L / 31.2 cu-ft
539 L / 19.0 cu-ft ~ 1351 L / 47.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.8 L / 8.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1477 mm / 58.1 in
1506 mm / 59.3 in
Size | Length
4059 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1735 mm / 68.3 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1509.0 mm / 59.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
1509.0 mm / 59.4 in
Wheelbase
2830 mm / 111.4 in
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Euro 5

Reviews

Neofiliac score
48%
19%
20%
Pros
  • Good exterior styling
  • Fully independent suspensions
  • Good engine lineup
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Rather good automatic transmissions
  • Decent exterior design
  • OKish engine reliability
Cons
  • Strange rear quarter view
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Nasty interior

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.