Compare Opel Signum vs Mercedes B-Class W247 vs Opel Astra L
Variants
1.8 122
1.8 140
1.9 CDTI 100
1.9 CDTI 120
1.9 CDTI 150
1.9 CDTI 150 AT
2.0 DTI 100
2.0 Turbo 175
2.2 155
2.2 155 AT
2.2 DTI 125
2.2 DTI 125 AT
2.8 Turbo
2.8 Turbo AT
3.0 CDTI 177
3.0 CDTI 177 AT
3.0 CDTI 184
3.0 CDTI 184 AT
3.2 211
3.2 211 AT
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT
1.2 Turbo 110
1.2 Turbo 130
1.2 Turbo 130 AT
1.5d 130
1.5d 130 AT
1.6 Turbo 180 PHEV
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
7.8 L / 8.2 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.5 m / 34.5 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
12.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4419 mm / 174.0 in
4374 mm / 172.2 in
Size | Width
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1551.0 mm / 61.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2830 mm / 111.4 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
Performance
Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
66.0 km / 41.0 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Euro 6d
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Transmission | Gears
6 / 7 / 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual / automatic / DCT
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2018 Paris Auto Show
Reviews
Neofiliac score
48%
27%
29%
Pros
- Good exterior styling
- Fully independent suspensions
- Good engine lineup
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Better-looking than before
- Low fuel consumption
- Improved styling
Cons
- Strange rear quarter view
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
- Utilitarian
- Poor performance
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.