Compare Fiat Punto 199 vs Fiat 500 vs Fiat 500 facelift

Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.2 69
1.3 Multijet 85
1.3 Multijet 95
1.4 77
1.4 MultiAir 105
1.4 T-Jet 135
0.9 TWIN AIR
1.2
1.3 Multijet
1.4
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
4
4
Payload
440 kg / 970 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent

Construction

Body Style
3/5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1488 mm / 58.6 in
Size | Length
4065 mm / 160.0 in
3546 mm / 139.6 in
Size | Width
1687 mm / 66.4 in
1627 mm / 64.1 in
Track Width | Front
1473.0 mm / 58.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
1408.0 mm / 55.4 in
Wheelbase
2510 mm / 98.8 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
0.362
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Type
Manual
Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score
16%
20%
25%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Excellent exterior styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.