HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Fiat Bravo 198 vs Fiat Punto 199 vs Fiat 500 facelift

Variants
1.4
1.4 MultiAir
1.4 T-Jet 120
1.4 T-Jet 150
1.6 Multijet 105
1.6 Multijet 120
1.6 Multijet 90
1.9 MultiJet 120
1.9 MultiJet 150
2.0 Multijet
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.2 69
1.3 Multijet 85
1.3 Multijet 95
1.4 77
1.4 MultiAir 105
1.4 T-Jet 135
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
400 L / 14.1 cu-ft ~ 1175 L / 41.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
4
Payload
510 kg / 1124 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3/5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
Size | Length
4336 mm / 170.7 in
4065 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1792 mm / 70.6 in
1687 mm / 66.4 in
Track Width | Front
1538.0 mm / 60.6 in
1473.0 mm / 58.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1532.0 mm / 60.3 in
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2510 mm / 98.8 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
0.362
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Transmission | Type
Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score
28%
16%
25%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent, punchy engines
  • Good manual transmission
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.