Compare Hyundai i30 vs Hyundai Accent 4 Hatchback vs Hyundai i20 II
Variants
1.4
1.4 Euro5
1.6 122
1.6 122 AT
1.6 126
1.6 126 Euro5
1.6 126 AT
1.6 126 Euro5 AT
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 116 Euro5
1.6 CRDi 116 Euro5 AT
1.6 CRDi 116 AT
1.6 CRDi 90 Euro5
1.6 CRDi 90
2.0 143
2.0 143 AT
2.0 CRDi
1.6 GDi
1.6 GDi AT
1.6 MPi
1.6 MPi AT
1.0 T-GDI 100
1.0 T-GDI 101
1.0 T-GDI 101 DCT
1.0 T-GDI 120
1.0 T-GDI 120 Euro6d
1.0 T-GDI 120 Euro6d DCT
1.1 CRDi 75
1.2 75
1.2 75 Euro6d
1.2 84 Euro6d
1.2 84
1.4 100
1.4 100 AT
1.4 CRDi 90
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
3.3 L / 3.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 256 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 262 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3- / 5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1474 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Length
4115 mm / 162.0 in
4035 mm / 158.9 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1700 mm / 66.9 in
Track Width | Front
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
77.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
85.4 mm / 3.4 in
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
34%
19%
23%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Elegant exterior design
- Fully independent suspension setup
- Small turning circle
- New 7-speed DCT
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Decent exterior design
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.