Compare Hyundai Accent 3 Hatchback vs Hyundai i30 vs Hyundai i20 II
Variants
1.4
1.4 AT
1.5 CRDi
1.6
1.6 AT
1.4
1.4 Euro5
1.6 122
1.6 122 AT
1.6 126
1.6 126 Euro5
1.6 126 AT
1.6 126 Euro5 AT
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 116 Euro5
1.6 CRDi 116 Euro5 AT
1.6 CRDi 116 AT
1.6 CRDi 90 Euro5
1.6 CRDi 90
2.0 143
2.0 143 AT
2.0 CRDi
1.0 T-GDI 100
1.0 T-GDI 101
1.0 T-GDI 101 DCT
1.0 T-GDI 120
1.0 T-GDI 120 Euro6d
1.0 T-GDI 120 Euro6d DCT
1.1 CRDi 75
1.2 75
1.2 75 Euro6d
1.2 84 Euro6d
1.2 84
1.4 100
1.4 100 AT
1.4 CRDi 90
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
3.3 L / 3.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
185/65 R14
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3- / 5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1474 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Length
4045 mm / 159.3 in
4035 mm / 158.9 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1462.0 mm / 57.6 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheel Size
5.5 J x14
15 in
Wheelbase
2500 mm / 98.4 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
18%
34%
23%
Pros
- Decent engine reliability
- Small turning circle
- Small turning circle
- Elegant exterior design
- Fully independent suspension setup
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Decent exterior design
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.