Compare Hyundai Accent 3 Hatchback vs Hyundai i20 vs Hyundai i20

Variants
1.4
1.4 AT
1.5 CRDi
1.6
1.6 AT
1.0 T-GDi 100
1.0 T-GDi 100 DCT
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.0 T-GDi 120 DCT
1.2 MPi
i20 N
1.1 CRDi
1.2 78
1.2 86
1.4
1.4 AT
1.4 Euro5
1.4 Euro5 AT
1.4 CRDi 75
1.4 CRDi 90 Euro5
1.4 CRDi 90
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 128

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
0.0 L / 0.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
430 kg / 948 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Disc, 320 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc, 262 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
185/65 R14
215/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.5 m / 34.6 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
150 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1490 mm / 58.7 in
Size | Length
4045 mm / 159.3 in
3940 mm / 155.1 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1710 mm / 67.3 in
Track Width | Front
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1462.0 mm / 57.6 in
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
Weight
1190.0 kg / 2623.5 lbs
Wheel Size
5.5 J x14
Wheelbase
2500 mm / 98.4 in
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
33.9 m / 111.2 ft
CO2 Emission
158 g/km
Fuel Economy
7.0 L/100km / 33.6 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
229.0 km/h / 142.3 mph
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
18%
35%
14%
Pros
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent exterior design
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Low build quality
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tinyengines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.