Compare Volkswagen Golf 5 vs Volkswagen Polo 5 (6R) vs Audi A1
Variants
1.4 FSI 90
1.4 75
1.4 80
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 122 DCT
1.4 TSI 140
1.6 FSI
1.6 102
1.6 102 AT
1.9 TDI 105
1.9 TDI 105 4Motion
1.9 TDI 105 4Motion DCT
1.9 TDI 90
2.0 FSI 150
2.0 FSI 150 4Motion
GTI 230
GTI 230 AT
GTI 200
GTI 200 AT
SDI 75
2.0 TDI 140
2.0 TDI 140 4Motion
2.0 TDI 170
R32 AWD
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI
1.2 TSI
1.2 TSI DCT
1.4
1.4 DCT
1.6 TDI 75
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DCT
GTI
1.2 TFSI
1.4 TFSI 122
1.4 TFSI 122 DCT
1.4 TFSI 140
1.4 TFSI 140 DCT
1.4 TFSI 185 DCT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DCT
2.0 TDI
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
350 L / 12.4 cu-ft ~ 1305 L / 46.1 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
375 kg / 827 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.6 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
11.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
3- / 5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
133 mm / 5.2 in
Size | Height
1416 mm / 55.7 in
Size | Length
3954 mm / 155.7 in
Size | Width
1759 mm / 69.3 in
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1528.0 mm / 60.2 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Wheelbase
2578 mm / 101.5 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
139 g/km
Towing Capacity
630 kg / 1389 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Euro 5
Reviews
Neofiliac score
45%
23%
22%
Pros
- Interesting VR6 engine
- Good manual transmission
- Clean, sporty design
- Fully independent suspensions
- Low fuel consumption
- Simple, modern design
- New 7-speed DSG transmission
- Low official fuel consumption
- Better looking than the Sportback
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 6-speed DSG
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.