Compare Volkswagen Polo 5 (6R) vs SEAT Ibiza 4 vs Volkswagen Up facelift

Volkswagen Polo 5 (6R) Hatchback (2009-2014)

Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii facelift Hatchback (2016)

Volkswagen | Cars

SEAT | Cars

Volkswagen | Cars

Variants

1.2 60

1.2 70

1.2 TDI

1.2 TSI

1.2 TSI DCT

1.4

1.4 DCT

1.6 TDI 75

1.6 TDI 90

1.6 TDI 90 DCT

GTI

1.0

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 110 DSG

1.0 TSI 95

1.2 60

1.2 70

1.2 TDI

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 105 DSG

1.2 TSI 85

1.2 TSI 90

1.4 85

1.4 85 2012+

1.4 TDI 105

1.4 TDI 75

1.4 TDI 80

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

1.4 TSI 140

1.4 TSI 150

1.4 TSI 150 DSG

1.6

1.6 DSG

1.6 LPG

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 90

1.6 TDI 90 DSG

1.9 TDI 105

1.9 TDI 90

2.0 TDI

1.0 60

1.0 60 ASG

1.0 75

1.0 75 ASG

1.0 75 Euro6d

1.0 EcoFuel 68

1.0 EcoFuel 68 Euro6d

1.0 MPI 65

1.0 TSI 90

1.0 TSI 90 Euro6d

GTI

GTI Euro6d

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

13.6 deg

Offroad | Breakover Angle

11.8 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

16.8 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent

Turning Circle

10.6 m / 34.8 ft

9.8 m / 32.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

3- / 5-door Hatchback

3-5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

133 mm / 5.2 in

144 mm / 5.7 in

Size | Length

3600 mm / 141.7 in

Size | Width

1693 mm / 66.7 in

Track Width | Front

1412.0 mm / 55.6 in

Track Width | Rear

1408.0 mm / 55.4 in

Wheelbase

2469 mm / 97.2 in

Performance

CO2 Emission

139 g/km

Towing Capacity

630 kg / 1389 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Engine | Displacement

1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc

Reviews

Neofiliac score

23%

16%

Pros

Low fuel consumption
Simple, modern design
New 7-speed DSG transmission

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspension

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

Horrible performance
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.