Compare Volkswagen e-Up vs Renault Twingo III facelift vs Renault Twingo II

Variants
Pre-facelift
Post-facelift
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.
1.2 58
1.2 76
1.2 GT 100
1.2 75 Euro5
1.5 dCi 64
RS 1.6 133

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Drum
Offroad | Approach Angle
15.5 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
11.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
29.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
165/70 R14, 165/65 R15
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
8.8 m / 28.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
18.7 kWh (gross) | 16.0 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
374.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Width
1645 mm / 64.8 in | 1910 mm / 75.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1428.0 mm / 56.2 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1424.0 mm / 56.1 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Wheel Size
5J x 14, 5J x 15
Wheelbase
2492 mm / 98.1 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
12.4 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
11.8 sec
Top Speed
130.0 km/h / 80.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Power
82 hp / 61.1 kW @ 2800-12000 rpm
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score
3%
3%
14%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Very small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Stylish design
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Miserable electric range
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • The bus is much better
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.