Compare Volkswagen Up vs SEAT Ibiza 5 vs Nissan Micra 4

Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii Hatchback (2011-2016)

Nissan Micra / March 4 (K13) Hatchback (2010-2017)

Volkswagen | Cars

SEAT | Cars

Nissan | Cars

Variants

1.0 60

1.0 60 AT

1.0 75

1.0 75 AT

1.0 CNG

1.0 TSI 115

1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d

1.0 TSI 115 DSG

1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d DSG

1.0 TSI 95

1.0 65

1.0 75

1.0 80

1.0 80 Euro6d

1.0 TGI 90 CNG

1.5 TSI 150 DSG

1.5 TSI 150

1.6 110

1.6 110 AT

1.6 90

1.6 TDI 80

1.6 TDI 95

1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d

1.6 TDI 95 DSG

1.2

1.2 CVT

1.2 DIG-S

1.2 DIG-S CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

251 L / 8.9 cu-ft ~ 951 L / 33.6 cu-ft

Engine Oil Capacity

3.4 L / 3.6 qt

Fuel Capacity

35.0 L / 9.2 gal

41.0 L / 10.8 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Disc

Brakes | Rear

Drum

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent, Torsion

Turning Circle

9.8 m / 32.1 ft

9.3 m / 30.5 ft

Construction

Body Style

3-5-door Hatchback

5-door Hatchback

Form Factor

3/5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height

1489 mm / 58.6 in

1444 mm / 56.9 in

1525 mm / 60.0 in

Size | Length

3540 mm / 139.4 in

4059 mm / 159.8 in

Size | Width

1645 mm / 64.8 in

1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)

Track Width | Front

1428.0 mm / 56.2 in

1525.0 mm / 60.0 in

1470.0 mm / 57.9 in

Track Width | Rear

1424.0 mm / 56.1 in

1505.0 mm / 59.3 in

1475.0 mm / 58.1 in

Wheelbase

2420 mm / 95.3 in

2564 mm / 100.9 in

2450 mm / 96.5 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Engine | Displacement

1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc

1.2 L / 73.1 cu-in / 1198.0 cc

Engine | Type

Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-3 engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Gears

5-speed

Transmission | Type

Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score

11%

17%

Pros

Fuel efficient
Easy to drive and park
Small turning circle

Low official fuel consumption
More coherent design than Mk4

Small turning circle
Low fuel consumption

Cons

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.