Compare Ford B-MAX vs Citroen DS3 vs Citroen C2

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 120
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.4 Duratec 90
1.5 TDCi 75
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105 AT
1.2 e-VTi PureTech ETG
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 82
1.2 PureTech 82 ETG
1.4 e-HDi 70 ETG
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95 ETG
1.4 VTi 95 GPL
1.4 VTi Airdream 95
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 110
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 90
1.6 e-HDi 90 ETG
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 165
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
Racing 1.6 T 202
Racing 1.6 T 207
1.1i
1.1i Euro4
1.4 HDi
1.4 HDi AT
1.4 HDi Euro4
1.4i 75
1.4i 75 AT
1.4i 90 AT
1.6i 110 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6i 110 AT
1.6i 125

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
318 L / 11.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
166 L / 5.9 cu-ft ~ 879 L / 31.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
41.0 L / 10.8 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.3 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1604 mm / 63.1 in
Size | Length
4077 mm / 160.5 in
3666 mm / 144.3 in
Size | Width
1751 mm / 68.9 in | 2067 mm / 81.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 1857 mm / 73.1 in (mirror folded)
1659 mm / 65.3 in | 1898 mm / 74.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1492.0 mm / 58.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1482.0 mm / 58.3 in
Wheelbase
2489 mm / 98.0 in
2464 mm / 97.0 in
2315 mm / 91.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
21%
3%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy entry and exit
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Less ugly than the C3
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to drive and park
Cons
  • Rather ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poorly put together
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.