Compare Honda Fit vs Renault Megane II vs Renault Megane III
Variants
1.2
1.4
1.4 CVT
1.4 82
1.4 98
1.5 dCi 101
1.5 dCi 101 AT
1.5 dCi 103
1.5 dCi 106
1.5 dCi 82
1.5 dCi 86
1.6 112
1.6 112 AT
1.6 113
1.6 113 AT
1.9 dCi 120
1.9 dCi 90
2.0 135
2.0 135 AT
2.0 Turbo 163
GT 1.9 dCi 110
GT 1.9 dCi 130
GT 1.9 dCi 130 AT
GT 2.0 dCi 150
RS 2.0 dCi 173
RS 2.0 Turbo 224
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 100
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 131
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 dCi 165
GT 2.0 TCe 180
GT 2.0 TCe 220
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft ~ 1323 L / 46.7 cu-ft
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1162 L / 41.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
185/55 R15
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1525 mm / 60.0 in
Size | Length
3830 mm / 150.8 in
4295 mm / 169.1 in
Size | Width
1675 mm / 65.9 in
Track Width | Front
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1445.0 mm / 56.9 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Weight
980.0 kg / 2160.5 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2450 mm / 96.5 in
2641 mm / 104.0 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Production
Availability
2002 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
16%
16%
20%
Pros
- Good styling
- Good Honda L engine
- Good manual transmission
- Interesting engine options
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent engine reliability
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- CVT
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Questionable CVT and auto gearboxes
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.