HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Megane IV vs Renault Clio IV vs Renault Twingo II

Variants
1.2 TCe 100
1.2 TCe 130
1.2 TCe 130 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 AT
1.5 dCi 95
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 SCe 115
1.7 dCi 150 7AT
1.7 dCi 150 6AT
GT 1.6 dCi 165 AT
GT 1.6 TCe 205 AT
RS 1.8
RS 1.8 AT
RS Trophy 1.8
0.9 90
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 120 AT
1.2 75 Euro6
1.2 75
1.2 TCe 120 AT
1.2 TCe 120
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 75 Euro6
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 90 AT
1.5 dCi 90 Euro6
1.5 dCi 90
RS 200 AT
RS 200 Euro6 AT
RS 220 AT
1.2 58
1.2 76
1.2 GT 100
1.2 75 Euro5
1.5 dCi 64
RS 1.6 133

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1447 mm / 57.0 in
1448 mm / 57.0 in
Size | Length
4359 mm / 171.6 in
4062 mm / 159.9 in
Size | Width
1814 mm / 71.4 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheelbase
2669 mm / 105.1 in
2589 mm / 101.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score
22%
16%
14%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Stylish design
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.