Compare Renault Twingo III vs Chevrolet Bolt EV vs Renault Twingo III facelift
Variants
0.9 TCe
1.0 SCe
GT 0.9 TCe
GT 0.9 TCe AT
60 kWh
66 kWh
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
188 L / 6.6 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
478 L / 16.9 cu-ft ~ 1603 L / 56.6 cu-ft
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
4
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 264 mm
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, De Dion
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
8.8 m / 28.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
153 mm / 6.0 in
Size | Length
3595 mm / 141.5 in
4166 mm / 164.0 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Weight
1616.0 kg / 3562.7 lbs
Wheelbase
2492 mm / 98.1 in
2492 mm / 98.1 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.5 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.308
Top Speed
145.0 km/h / 90.1 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Power
200 hp / 149.1 kW
Engine | Stroke
73.1 mm / 2.9 in
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
26%
17%
3%
Pros
- Interesting RWD setup
- Low fuel consumption
- Stylish design
- Notable improvement in range
- Very small turning circle
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Ugly
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Miserable electric range
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- The bus is much better
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.