Compare Renault Twingo III vs Chevrolet Bolt EV facelift vs Renault Twingo III facelift

Variants
0.9 TCe
1.0 SCe
GT 0.9 TCe
GT 0.9 TCe AT
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
188 L / 6.6 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft ~ 1614 L / 57.0 cu-ft
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 264 mm
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, De Dion
Helical spring, Torsion
Semi-independent
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
8.8 m / 28.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
65.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
153 mm / 6.0 in
Size | Height
1611 mm / 63.4 in
Size | Length
3595 mm / 141.5 in
4145 mm / 163.2 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Weight
1628.0 kg / 3589.1 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2492 mm / 98.1 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2492 mm / 98.1 in

Performance

Charging Time
120V: 4 miles of range in approx. 1 hour, 240V: Full charge in approx. 7 hours, DC Fast Charge: Up to 100 miles in 30 min
Electric Range
259 miles (416 km)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Power
200 hp / 149.1 kW
Engine | Stroke
73.1 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Torque
266 lb-ft / 360 Nm
Engine | Type
Permanent magnetic drive motor
Final Drive
7.05:1
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2021
Debut
2021-02-14

Reviews

Neofiliac score
26%
6%
3%
Pros
  • Interesting RWD setup
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Stylish design
  • Tax incentives
  • Very small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Horrible styling
  • Poor build quality
  • EV nonsense
  • Battery pollution
  • Poor handling
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Miserable electric range
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • The bus is much better

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.