HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Grand Modus vs Renault Scenic 4 vs Renault Modus

Variants
1.2
1.2 TCe
1.5 dCi 103 AT
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86 5MT
1.5 dCi 86 6MT
1.6 AT
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 160 AT
1.7 dCi 120
1.7 dCi 120 AT
1.7 dCi 150
1.7 dCi 150 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2
1.4
1.5 dCi 103
1.5 dCi 106
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86
1.6 112
1.6 112 AT
1.6 88

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
305 L / 10.8 cu-ft ~ 1454 L / 51.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Minivan
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1589 mm / 62.6 in
1653 mm / 65.1 in
1589 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4034 mm / 158.8 in
4406 mm / 173.5 in
Size | Width
1709 mm / 67.3 in | 1960 mm / 77.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1866 mm / 73.5 in | 2128 mm / 83.8 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
1602.0 mm / 63.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
Wheel Size
20 in
Wheelbase
2575 mm / 101.4 in
2734 mm / 107.6 in
2482 mm / 97.7 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
3%
17%
6%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling
  • Low build quality
  • Rather bad design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.