HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Grand Modus vs BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 vs Renault Grand Scenic 4

Variants
1.2
1.2 TCe
1.5 dCi 103 AT
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86 5MT
1.5 dCi 86 6MT
1.6 AT
214d
216d
218d
218d AT
218i
218i AT
220d
220d AT
220d xDrive AT
220i
220i AT
225i AT
225i xDrive AT
225xe xDrive AT
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 110 Hybrid
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 160 AT
1.7 dCi 120
1.7 dCi 120 AT
1.7 dCi 150
1.7 dCi 150 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
305 L / 10.8 cu-ft ~ 1454 L / 51.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5 / 7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 320 mm
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc, 290 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
7.6 kWh (gross) | 5.8 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
293.0 V
Body Style
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1589 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4034 mm / 158.8 in
4342 mm / 170.9 in
Size | Width
1709 mm / 67.3 in | 1960 mm / 77.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1800 mm / 70.9 in
1866 mm / 73.5 in | 2128 mm / 83.8 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
1602.0 mm / 63.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
20 in
Wheelbase
2575 mm / 101.4 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2804 mm / 110.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
3%
34%
10%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Lots of space inside
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.