Compare Renault Zoe vs Chevrolet Bolt EV vs Renault Twingo III facelift

Variants
Q210
Q90
R110
R240
R75
R90 22kWh
R90 41kWh
60 kWh
66 kWh
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
338 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1225 L / 43.3 cu-ft
478 L / 16.9 cu-ft ~ 1603 L / 56.6 cu-ft
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc, 264 mm
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
8.8 m / 28.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4084 mm / 160.8 in
4166 mm / 164.0 in
Size | Width
1730 mm / 68.1 in | 1945 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Weight
1616.0 kg / 3562.7 lbs
Wheelbase
2588 mm / 101.9 in
2492 mm / 98.1 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.5 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.308
Top Speed
135.0 km/h / 83.9 mph
145.0 km/h / 90.1 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Power
200 hp / 149.1 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
18%
17%
3%
Pros
  • Stylish design
  • Easy to drive and park in big cities
  • Notable improvement in range
  • Very small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Short electric range
  • Air-cooled battery
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugly
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Miserable electric range
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • The bus is much better

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.