HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Clio IV vs Subaru Impreza 4 Hatchback vs Renault Megane IV

Variants
0.9 90
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 120 AT
1.2 75 Euro6
1.2 75
1.2 TCe 120 AT
1.2 TCe 120
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 75 Euro6
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 90 AT
1.5 dCi 90 Euro6
1.5 dCi 90
RS 200 AT
RS 200 Euro6 AT
RS 220 AT
1.6i AWD
1.6i AWD CVT
1.6i FWD
1.6i FWD CVT
2.0i AWD
2.0i AWD CVT
1.2 TCe 100
1.2 TCe 130
1.2 TCe 130 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 AT
1.5 dCi 95
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 SCe 115
1.7 dCi 150 7AT
1.7 dCi 150 6AT
GT 1.6 dCi 165 AT
GT 1.6 TCe 205 AT
RS 1.8
RS 1.8 AT
RS Trophy 1.8

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent, coil spring

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
145 mm / 5.7 in
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1448 mm / 57.0 in
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1447 mm / 57.0 in
Size | Length
4062 mm / 159.9 in
4359 mm / 171.6 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1814 mm / 71.4 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2589 mm / 101.9 in
2645 mm / 104.1 in
2669 mm / 105.1 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1

Reviews

Neofiliac score
16%
42%
22%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
  • Much sleeker styling
  • Higher engine output
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Bad CVT
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.