Compare Renault Clio III vs Renault Twingo III facelift vs Volkswagen ID.3
Variants
1.2 59
1.2 75
1.2 75 AT
1.2 78 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2i 101
1.2i 65
1.4 98
1.5 dCi 105
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 86
1.5 dCi 86 AT
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 88
2.0 138
2.0 138 AT
2.0 197
RS
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.
Pro
Pro Performance
Pro S
Pure Performance
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
385 L / 13.6 cu-ft ~ 1267 L / 44.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Turning Circle
8.8 m / 28.7 ft
10.2 m / 33.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
408.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
Platform
MEB
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
150 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1568 mm / 61.7 in
Size | Length
4261 mm / 167.8 in
Size | Width
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
1536.0 mm / 60.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
1513.0 mm / 59.6 in
Wheelbase
2492 mm / 98.1 in
2770 mm / 109.1 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.1 m / 121.7 ft
CO2 Emission
137 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Top Speed
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph
Towing Capacity
535 kg / 1179 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020-06-17 (2020-10 delivery date)
Debut
2019 IAA
Reviews
Neofiliac score
9%
3%
32%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Decent engine reliability
- Very small turning circle
- Up to extraordinary 549km electric range
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Unreliable transmissions
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Miserable electric range
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- The bus is much better
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.