Compare Kia Cee'd (ED) vs Alfa Romeo Giulietta (940) facelift vs Alfa Romeo MiTo (955)

Kia Cee'd (ED)

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (940) facelift

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955)

Kia Cee'd (ED)Alfa Romeo Giulietta (940) faceliftAlfa Romeo MiTo (955)
Variants
1.4
1.4 CVVT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 90
1.6 CVVT
1.6 CVVT AT
1.6D 115
1.6D 115 AT
1.6D 126
1.6D 126 AT
1.6D 90
2.0 CRDi
2.0 CVVT
2.0 CVVT AT
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 120 Euro6d
1.4 TB MultiAir 150
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d
1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d TCT
1.6 MultiJet 120
1.6 MultiJet 120 TCT
1.75 TBi
2.0 MultiJet 170 Euro6d TCT
2.0 MultiJet 150
2.0 MultiJet 175 TCT
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.3 JTD 90
1.3 JTD 85
1.4
1.4 MPI
1.4 TB MultiAir 105
1.4 TB MultiAir 135
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 155
1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 JTD

Reviews

Neofiliac score25%46%25%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Fully independent suspensions
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Sweet design
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Beautiful design
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Not as good-looking as the Pro Cee'd
  • More emission nonsense causing reliability concerns
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Very tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.