Compare Citroen C3 III vs Citroen C4 II vs Citroen C4 Coupe

Citroen C3 III

Citroen C4 II

Citroen C4 Coupe

Citroen C3 IIICitroen C4 IICitroen C4 Coupe
Variants
1.2 110 Euro6d
1.2 110
1.2 110 Euro6d AT
1.2 110 AT
1.2 68
1.2 68 Euro6d
1.2 82 Euro6d
1.2 82
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 BlueHDi 99
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.4 VTi 95
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99
1.6 e-HDI 112
1.6 e-HDi 112 AT
1.6 e-HDI 114
1.6 e-HDI 114 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDI 114
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 156 AT
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 HDi 150
1.4 88
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 THP
1.6 VTi
1.6 VTi AT
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0
VTS 2.0

Reviews

Neofiliac score8%13%13%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Slightly better automatic transmission
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugliness in the black plastic flavor
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny or small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Ugly
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.