Compare Citroen C3 II vs Citroen DS5 vs Citroen C4

Variants
1.0 68
1.1 60
1.2 110
1.2 82
1.2 82 AT
1.4 95
1.4 95 AT
1.4 95 AT
1.4 e-HDi 68 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 68 2013+
1.4i 73
1.6 120
1.6 120 2013+
1.6 120 AT
1.6 120 AT 2013+
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 BlueHDI 99
1.6 e-HDI 114 AT
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDI 92 2013+
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 e-HDI 92 AT 2013+
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi AT
1.6 THP 155 AT
1.6 THP 200
2.0 BlueHDi 120
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
2.0 HDi 160 AT
2.0 HDi 165
2.0 Hybrid4
1.4 88
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 109 AT
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 THP 140 AT
1.6 THP 150
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
1.6i 109
1.6i 109 AT
2.0 HDi 136 5MP
2.0 HDi 136 6MP
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0i 140
2.0i 140 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
320 L / 11.3 cu-ft ~ 1023 L / 36.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Length
3941 mm / 155.2 in
4530 mm / 178.3 in
Size | Width
1871 mm / 73.7 in
1773 mm / 69.8 in | 1964 mm / 77.3 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
Wheelbase
2466 mm / 97.1 in
2727 mm / 107.4 in
2608 mm / 102.7 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
13%
26%
16%
Pros
  • Good 0.29 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Lots of interior space
  • Good front- and rear-quarter views
  • Good transmissions
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bug ugly
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Hybrid nonsense
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.