Compare Citroen C2 vs Citroen C1 II 5-door vs Citroen DS4

Variants
1.1i
1.1i Euro4
1.4 HDi
1.4 HDi AT
1.4 HDi Euro4
1.4i 75
1.4i 75 AT
1.4i 90 AT
1.6i 110 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6i 110 AT
1.6i 125
1.0 69
1.0 69 ETG
1.0 72
1.0 72 ETG
1.2 82
Airscape 1.0 72
1.2 130
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 112
1.6 e-HDi 112 AT
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 115 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 156
1.6 THP 163 AT
1.6 THP 165 AT
1.6 THP 200
1.6 VTi 120
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 181 AT
2.0 HDi 163
2.0 HDi 163 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
166 L / 5.9 cu-ft ~ 879 L / 31.0 cu-ft
196 L / 6.9 cu-ft ~ 780 L / 27.5 cu-ft
385 L / 13.6 cu-ft ~ 1021 L / 36.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
41.0 L / 10.8 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
9.6 m / 31.5 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
1533 mm / 60.4 in
Size | Length
3666 mm / 144.3 in
3466 mm / 136.5 in
4275 mm / 168.3 in
Size | Width
1659 mm / 65.3 in | 1898 mm / 74.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1615 mm / 63.6 in | 1884 mm / 74.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheelbase
2315 mm / 91.1 in
2340 mm / 92.1 in
2612 mm / 102.8 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
3%
14%
18%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to drive and park
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugly
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.