HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Citroen DS3 vs Citroen C3 III facelift vs Citroen DS4

Variants
1.2 e-VTi PureTech ETG
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 82
1.2 PureTech 82 ETG
1.4 e-HDi 70 ETG
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95 ETG
1.4 VTi 95 GPL
1.4 VTi Airdream 95
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 110
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 90
1.6 e-HDi 90 ETG
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 165
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
Racing 1.6 T 202
Racing 1.6 T 207
1.2 110
1.2 110 AT
1.2 83
1.5 HDi 102
1.2 130
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 112
1.6 e-HDi 112 AT
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 115 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 156
1.6 THP 163 AT
1.6 THP 165 AT
1.6 THP 200
1.6 VTi 120
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 181 AT
2.0 HDi 163
2.0 HDi 163 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
385 L / 13.6 cu-ft ~ 1021 L / 36.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1474 mm / 58.0 in
1533 mm / 60.4 in
Size | Length
3996 mm / 157.3 in
4275 mm / 168.3 in
Size | Width
1749 mm / 68.9 in | 2007 mm / 79.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1829 mm / 72.0 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
2464 mm / 97.0 in
2539 mm / 100.0 in
2612 mm / 102.8 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
21%
8%
18%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Less ugly than the C3
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.