Compare Audi S3 Sportback 8PA vs Audi A1 Sportback vs Mercedes CLC CL203
Variants
2.0 TFSI 256 quattro
2.0 TFSI 256 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 265 quattro
2.0 TFSI 265 quattro DCT
1.2 TFSI
1.4 TFSI 122
1.4 TFSI 122 DCT
1.4 TFSI 140
1.4 TFSI 140 DCT
1.4 TFSI 185 DCT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DCT
2.0 TDI
CLC 160
CLC 160 AT
CLC 180 Kompressor
CLC 180 Kompressor AT
CLC 200 CDI
CLC 200 CDI AT
CLC 200 Kompressor
CLC 200 Kompressor AT
CLC 220 CDI
CLC 220 CDI AT
CLC 230
CLC 230 AT
CLC 250
CLC 250 AT
CLC 350
CLC 350 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
302 L / 10.7 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
310 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.6 L / 9.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1402 mm / 55.2 in
1422 mm / 56.0 in
1405 mm / 55.3 in
Size | Length
4302 mm / 169.4 in
3954 mm / 155.7 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
1476.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 18
Wheelbase
2578 mm / 101.5 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.1 cu-in / 1984.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
49%
18%
31%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Low official fuel consumption
- RWD remained
- Slight interior improvements
Cons
- Only available a small engine
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- Somewhat ugly
- Arguably less appealing than its predecessor
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Cheaply put together
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.