Compare Audi S3 Sportback 8PA vs Audi A3 8Y vs Skoda Scala
Variants
2.0 TFSI 256 quattro
2.0 TFSI 256 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 265 quattro
2.0 TFSI 265 quattro DCT
30 g-tron DCT
30 TDI
30 TFSI
30 TFSI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TFSI e DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
1.0
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI DSG
Edition S
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
302 L / 10.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.6 L / 9.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.9 deg
14.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
225/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
149 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1402 mm / 55.2 in
1471 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4302 mm / 169.4 in
4343 mm / 171.0 in
4362 mm / 171.7 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1816 mm / 71.5 in | 1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 18
Wheelbase
2578 mm / 101.5 in
2649 mm / 104.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
74.5 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.1 cu-in / 1984.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
Debut
2020-03
Reviews
Neofiliac score
49%
41%
12%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Athletic styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Only available a small engine
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Ugly
- Poor performance
- Only available with small engines
- Poor handling and comfort
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.