Compare Audi S3 8P1 facelift vs Audi A3 8Y vs Chrysler PT Cruiser
Variants
2.0 TFSI 256 quattro
2.0 TFSI 256 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 265 quattro
2.0 TFSI 265 quattro DCT
30 g-tron DCT
30 TDI
30 TFSI
30 TFSI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TFSI e DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
1.6
2.0 141PS
2.0 141PS AT
2.0 150PS
2.0 150PS AT
2.2D 150PS
2.2D 121PS
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4T 182PS
2.4T 182PS AT
2.4T 220PS
2.4T 220PS AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
281 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 1011 L / 35.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.6 L / 9.1 qt
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
560 kg / 1235 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.9 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1399 mm / 55.1 in
Size | Length
4230 mm / 166.5 in
4343 mm / 171.0 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1816 mm / 71.5 in | 1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 18
Wheelbase
2578 mm / 101.5 in
Performance
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
74.5 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.8:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.1 cu-in / 1984.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
Debut
2020-03
Reviews
Neofiliac score
53%
41%
2%
Pros
- Generally good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Athletic styling
- So ugly that it's an icon
Cons
- Only available with small engine
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Roughly unchanged from pre-facelift
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Not independent rear suspensions
- Truly epitomizes ugliness
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.