Compare Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH) Hatchback vs Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift vs Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)

Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH) Hatchback

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) facelift

Mazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)

Mazda 6 / Atenza II (GH) HatchbackMazda 3 / Axela II (BL) faceliftMazda 3 / Axela IV (BP)
Variants
1.8
2.0 147
2.0 147 AT
2.0 155 AT
2.0 CD
2.0 155
2.2 CD 129
2.2 CD 163
2.2 CD 180
2.2 CD 185
2.5 170
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
1.5 118 AT
1.8D 116
1.8D 116 AT
2.0 122
2.0 122 AT
2.0 162 AT
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181 AT
2.5 186 AT
2.5 186 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score49%42%48%
Pros
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Good engine lineup
  • Elegantly designed
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good towing capacity
  • Interesting Skyactiv-X engine
  • Improved styling
  • Good engine reliability
Cons
  • Unconventional shape
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Hatchback version fits the car better
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.