Compare Mazda 3 III Hatchback vs Mazda 2 II vs Toyota Aygo 2
Variants
1.5 Skyactiv-D
1.5 Skyactiv-D AT
1.5 SkyActiv-G
1.5 SkyActiv-G Euro6
2.0 SkyActiv-G 120
2.0 SkyActiv-G 155
2.0 SkyActiv-G 155 AT
2.0 SkyActiv-G 165
2.0 SkyActiv-G 165 i-ELOOP
2.0 SkyActiv-G 120 AT
2.0 SkyActiv-G 120 Euro6
2.0 SkyActiv-G 120 Euro6 AT
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.2 SkyActiv-D AT
2.5 SkyActiv-G
2.5 SkyActiv-G AT
1.3 75
1.3 75 Euro5
1.3 84
1.3 86
1.4 CD
1.5 102
1.5 102 AT
1.5 103
1.5 103 AT
1.6 CD 90
1.6 CD 95
Pre-facelift Automatic
Pre-facelift Manual
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft ~ 787 L / 27.8 cu-ft
168 L / 5.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
2.8 L / 3.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-/5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
155 mm / 6.1 in
150 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Width
1615 mm / 63.6 in
Track Width | Front
1430.0 mm / 56.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
Weight
860.0 kg / 1896.0 lbs
Wheel Size
14 in, 15 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2490 mm / 98.0 in
2340 mm / 92.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.31
Top Speed
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
71.0 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 60.9 cu-in / 998.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
54%
6%
18%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Beautiful styling
- Small turning circle
- Cute exterior design
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Very low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No more Mazdaspeed3
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Very little cargo space
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.