HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chevrolet Cruze Hatchback vs Opel Agila B vs Opel Astra J GTC

Variants
1.4
1.4 Turbo
1.4 Turbo AT
1.6
1.7 TD 110
1.7 TD 130
1.8 AT
1.8
2.0 TD AT
2.0 TD
1.0 65
1.0 68
1.2 86
1.2 86 AT
1.2 94
1.2 94 AT
1.3 CDTI 70
1.4
1.4 Turbo 120
1.4 Turbo 140
1.4 Turbo 140 AT
1.6 Turbo 170 AT
1.6 Turbo 170
1.6 Turbo 180
1.6 Turbo 200
1.7 CDTI 110
1.7 CDTI 130
1.8 140
2.0 CDTI 165 AT
2.0 CDTI 165
2.0 CDTI 195
OPC

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
413 L / 14.6 cu-ft ~ 883 L / 31.2 cu-ft
225 L / 7.9 cu-ft ~ 660 L / 23.3 cu-ft
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft ~ 1165 L / 41.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
56.0 L / 14.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
435 kg / 959 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
112 mm / 4.4 in
Size | Height
1477 mm / 58.1 in
1590 mm / 62.6 in
1482 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
3740 mm / 147.2 in
4466 mm / 175.8 in
Size | Width
1680 mm / 66.1 in
1840 mm / 72.4 in | 2020 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
Weight
1050.0 kg / 2314.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2360 mm / 92.9 in
2695 mm / 106.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5

Reviews

Neofiliac score
19%
5%
31%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Rather good automatic transmissions
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Great exterior styling
  • Decent engine options
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.