Compare Chevrolet Bolt EV vs Renault Twizy vs Renault Twingo II

Variants
60 kWh
66 kWh
1.2 58
1.2 76
1.2 GT 100
1.2 75 Euro5
1.5 dCi 64
RS 1.6 133

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
478 L / 16.9 cu-ft ~ 1603 L / 56.6 cu-ft
31 L / 1.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
5
2
4
Payload
216 kg / 476 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Ventilated discs, 214 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 264 mm
Ventilated discs, 204 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
MacPherson, Transverse stabilizer
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Front wheel tires: 125/80 R13 Rear wheel tires: 145/80 R13
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
6.8 m / 22.3 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
6.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
2-door battery-electric Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1454 mm / 57.2 in
Size | Length
4166 mm / 164.0 in
2338 mm / 92.0 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1237 mm / 48.7 in | 1381 mm / 54.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1094.0 mm / 43.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1080.0 mm / 42.5 in
Weight
1616.0 kg / 3562.7 lbs
474.0 kg / 1045.0 lbs
Wheelbase
1686 mm / 66.4 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.5 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.308
0.64
Top Speed
145.0 km/h / 90.1 mph
80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph, 80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph (EV mode)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Power
200 hp / 149.1 kW
17 hp / 12.7 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Manual

Production

Availability
2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
28%
14%
Pros
  • Notable improvement in range
  • Very small turning circle
  • Fun looks
  • Small turning circle
  • Stylish design
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugly
  • Not a real car
  • Horrid 0.64 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Very little cargo space
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.